Maja Chwalinska vs Marie Benoit Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L L L L
Form
L W L L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Chwalinska 2 - 1 Benoit
They have played 7 sets in total, with Chwalinska winning 4 and Benoit winning 3. The last match between Chwalinska and Benoit was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 08-01-2025, Q2 round, Hard with Maja Chwalinska getting the victory 6-1 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maja Chwalinska | 2 |
| Marie Benoit | 1 |
Australian Open - Melbourne(08-01-2025)
6
1
3
6
6
1
| Chwalinska | Stats | Benoit |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (5-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 125 | Ranking | 231 |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 188 |
| 23 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 15 |
| 66% (227-119) | Career Total W/L | 60% (464-308) |
| $332,820 | Career Prize Money | $140,589 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Chwalinska VS Benoit H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Marie Benoit
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Marie Benoit
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Maja Chwalinska
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Chwalinska VS Benoit H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 34 | Games Won | 28 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:8:0 | Average Match Time | 2:8:0 |
| 71% (160/226) | 1st Serve % | 76% (161/212) |
| 56% (89/160) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (83/161) |
| 50% (33/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (24/51) |
| 48% (15/31) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (13/27) |
| 50% (105/212) | Return Points Win % | 46% (104/226) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maja Chwalinska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maja Chwalinska
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Maja Chwalinska
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Maja Chwalinska
115%
(
61 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
40 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Maja Chwalinska
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
47 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Maja Chwalinska
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Maja Chwalinska
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
94)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
77 of
119)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
62 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
100
|
6-0 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Zarina Diyas
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Maja Chwalinska
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marie Benoit Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Marie Benoit
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Marie Benoit
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Nadiya Kolb
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve %
57%
(
16 of
28)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
34
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Marie Benoit
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Marie Benoit
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve %
81%
(
35 of
43)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Marie Benoit
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Iva Primorac
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Marie Benoit
43%
(
9 of
21)
1st Serve %
64%
(
14 of
22)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
26
Total Points Won
17
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (227/119) | Win/Loss | 60% (464/308) |
| 63% (491/287) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1032/740) |
| 56% (3871/3066) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8628/7359) |
| 64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (74/51) |
| 69% (133/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (343/216) |
| 59% (48/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (47/38) |
| 58% (7/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 166 | Aces Total | 721 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 719 | Total Double Faults | 1372 |
| 1:40:24 | Average Match Time | 1:20:40 |
| 448.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 543.91 |
| 70% (15075/21384) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23647/35849) |
| 58% (8816/15075) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (13905/23647) |
| 49% (3083/6309) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5756/12200) |
| 49% (1514/3070) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2433/4934) |
| 49% (10666/21896) | Return Points Win % | 48% (17555/36607) |
| 47% (9/10) | Slam W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (6/6) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (200/96) | Challenger W/L | 58% (305/225) |
| 71% (12/5) | Futures W/L | 69% (148/67) |
| 66% (222/336) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (460/767) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (36/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (79/151) |
| 57% (50/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (123/230) |
| 88% (225/198) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (446/390) |
| 12% (225/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (446/56) |
| 23% (121/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (326/73) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
